|
Sunday, August 13, 2017
TREASURER'S AFFIDAVIT
Saturday, August 5, 2017
JUDICIAL PARTITION
REPUBLIC
OF THE PHILIPPINES
NATIONAL CAPITAL JUDICIAL REGION
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
QUEZON CITY
BRANCH______
BBB CORPORATION
Represented by AAA A AAA,
Petitioner,
-versus-
Special Proceeding No.
LRA Case No. _______
For: JUDICIAL PARTITION
REAL PROPERTY
THE ESTATE OF THE LATE XXX X
XXX and
the HEIRS of
Sps.
XXX X XXX
and HHH H HHH,
Respondents.
x---------------------------------------------------------x
PETITION
COMES
NOW, the Petitioner by Counsel and unto this Honorable Court respectfully
states:
1. Petitioner is a domestic corporation, duly
registered with Securities and Exchange Commission, with office address at Unit 101 Roseland Building, Banahaw
Avenue, Quezon City, where it may be serve with court’s orders,
notices, decisions, summons and other court’s processes while Defendants are
with legal capacity and with residence address at 123 Kalayaan Avenue, Quezon
City, where they may be serve with summons, orders, notices, notices and other
court’s processes;
2. Defendants are the registered owners of a
parcel of land located in Quezon City, covered by TCT No. 45678 of the Registry of Deeds for Quezon City, containing
an area of 800 square meters, more or less, copy of which is
hereto attached as Annex “A”;
3. The said property of the defendants was
mortgaged to the herein Petitioner sometime in July 2005 to secure the mortgage
obligation of XXX X XXX, with the petitioner in the amount of One Million
Pesos (P1,000,000.00), copy of the Real Estate Mortgage is hereto attached
as Annex “B” and made integral
part hereof;
4. Upon default in the payment of the
mortgage obligation by the mortgagors XXX X XXX to herein petitioner, the same
property was foreclosed and a sheriff Certificate of Sale was issued on July
16, 2012 in favor of the petitioner as shown in the Entry No. 201255-23-345 inscribed
at the back of TCT No. 45678 Registry of Deeds for Quezon City;
5. The petitioner was able to register the
highest bid for the said property in the amount of P1,900,000.00;
6. On 19 October 2013, the petitioner
consolidated the ownership of the said property in its favor by executing an
affidavit of consolidation as per Entry No. 2345-678 dated 13 November
2013 shown at the back of TCT No. 45678;
7. On February 16, 2014, the petitioner
requested the defendants to voluntarily execute a Deed of Partition over
the said property covered by TCT No. 45678 but despite of which, the latter
failed and refused to do so, copy of which is hereto attached as Annex “C”
and made integral part hereof;
8. Forced to litigate, the petitioner was
constrained to engaged the services of a counsel for a fee of P50,000.00 by way
of attorney’s fees and expenses per court appearance in the amount of P4,000.00
for which the defendants should be held liable and the same must be paid to the
Petitioner;
PRAYER
WHEREFORE,
premises considered, it is most respectfully prayed of the Honorable Court that
after due hearing, a decision be rendered in favor of the petitioner and
against herein defendants, as follows:
1. Ordering the defendants to execute a Deed
of Partition over TCT No. 45678 of the Registry of Deeds for Quezon City,
dividing the property covered thereof into two equal shares, one-half (½ )
thereof goes to the Petitioner and the other half goes to the Defendants. In
case of unjust refusal of the respondents, the Branch Clerk of Court of this
Honorable Court be authorized to execute the said Deed of Partition of Real
Property;
2. Ordering the Respondents to pay the sum of
P50,000.00 by way of attorney’s fees and the expenses incurred in the filing of
this suit and its prosecution;
3. To pay the cost of the suit.
Such
other reliefs and remedies deemed just and equitable under the premises are
likewise prayed for.
Manila for Quezon City, October 19, 2014.
By:
ATTY. HHH H HHH
(office address)
IBP No. _______/__________/Manila
PTR No. ______/_________/Manila
Roll No. ________
MCLE Compliance
Certificate No. _________________
REPUBLIC
OF THE PHILIPPINES}
QUEZON
CITY
} S.S.
VERIFICATION WITH CERTIFICATION OF NON-FORUM
SHOPPING
I, AAA A AAA, of legal age,
married with office and corporate address at _______________________________, after having been duly sworn to in
accordance with law hereby deposes and states that:
1.
I
am the duly authorized representative of BBB Corporation, as evidenced in the
Secretary’s Certificate dated ____________. (Annex “D”);
2.
I
caused the preparation of the foregoing
Petition, read and understood the contents thereof, and hereby attests that the
same are true and correct of his own knowledge and from available authentic
documents in the possession of the Corporation;
3.
I
certify that Plaintiff has not commenced any action involving the same issues
before the Supreme Court, Court of Appeals, or other quasi-judicial body, that
to the best of his knowledge no such action is pending before said court,
tribunal or agency, and that should he learns thereafter of the pendency of any
such similar action, he undertakes to report the same to this Court in five (5)
days from notice.
AAA A AAA
Affiant
JURAT
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before
me this____day of ____________ 2014, affiant exhibited to me his LTO Driving
License No. NOP-04-2345678 issued on 11/12/2013 at Quezon City, Philippines.
NOTARY
PUBLIC
Doc. No.: ______;
Page
No.: ______;
Book
No.: ______;
Series
of ________.
Friday, August 4, 2017
Government Procurement (RA 9184): An Overview
Republic
Act 9184, also known as the Government Procurement Act covers all procurement
of Infrastructure Projects, Goods, and Consulting Services, regardless of
source of funds, whether local or foreign, by all branches and
instrumentalities of government, its departments, offices and agencies,
including government-owned and/or -controlled corporations and local government
units, subject to the provisions of Commonwealth
Act No. 138.
Procurement
refers to the acquisition of Goods,
Consulting Services, and the contracting for Infrastructure Projects
by the Procuring Entity. Procurement shall also include the lease of
goods and real estate. With respect to real property, its procurement shall be
governed by the provisions of Republic Act No. 8974, entitled “An Act to
Facilitate the Acquisition of Right-of-Way Site or Location for National
Government Infrastructure Projects and for Other Purposes”, and other
applicable laws, rules and regulations.
Under the
said law, all Procurement shall be done through competitive bidding except
in cases where alternative modes of procurement are allowed.
Competitive
Bidding
refers to a method of procurement which is open to participation by any
interested party and which consists of the following processes:
1. Advertisement;
2. Pre-bid
conference;
3. Eligibility
screening of prospective bidders;
4. Receipt and opening
of bids;
5. Evaluation
of bids;
6. Post-qualification
and
7. Award of
contract
Alternative
Methods of Procurement:
1. Limited Source Bidding (also known as Selective
Bidding) –
a method of Procurement that involves direct invitation to bid by the Procuring
Entity from a set of preselected suppliers or consultants with known experience
and proven capability relative to the requirements of a particular contract;
Limited Source Bidding may be resorted to only
in any of the following conditions:
(a) Procurement of highly specialized types of
Goods and Consulting Services which are known to be obtainable only from a
limited number of sources; or
(b) Procurement of major plant components where
it is deemed advantageous to limit the bidding to known eligible bidders in
order to maintain an optimum and uniform level of quality and performance of
the plant as a whole.
2. Direct Contracting (also known as Single Source
Procurement)
– a method of Procurement that does not require elaborate Bidding Documents
because the supplier is simply asked to submit a price quotation or a pro-forma
invoice together with the conditions of sale, which offer may be accepted
immediately or after some negotiations;
Direct Contracting may be resorted to only in
any of the following conditions:
(a) Procurement of Goods of proprietary nature,
which can be obtained only from the proprietary source, i.e. when patents,
trade secrets and copyrights prohibit others from manufacturing the same item;
(b) When the Procurement of critical components
from a specific manufacturer, supplier or distributor is a condition precedent
to hold a contractor to guarantee its project performance, in accordance with
the provisions of his contract; or,
(c) Those sold by an exclusive dealer or
manufacturer, which does not have sub-dealers selling at lower prices and for
which no suitable substitute can be obtained at more advantageous terms to the
Government.
3. Repeat Order – a method of Procurement
that involves a direct Procurement of Goods from the previous winning bidder,
whenever there is a need to replenish Goods procured under a contract
previously awarded through Competitive Bidding;
When provided for in the Annual Procurement
Plan, Repeat Order may be allowed wherein the Procuring Entity directly
procures Goods from the previous winning bidder whenever there arises a need to
replenish goods procured under a contract previously awarded through
Competitive Bidding, subject to post-qualification process prescribed in the
Bidding Documents and provided all the following conditions are present:
(a) The unit price must be equal to or lower
than that provided in the original contract;
(b) The repeat order does not result in
splitting of requisitions or purchase orders;
(c) Except in special circumstances defined in
the IRR, the repeat order shall be availed of only within six (6) months from
the date of the Notice to Proceed arising from the original contract; and,
(d) The repeat order shall not exceed
twenty-five percent (25%) of the quantity of each item of the original
contract.
4. Shopping – a method of Procurement whereby
the Procuring Entity simply requests for the submission of price quotations for
readily available off-the-shelf Goods or ordinary/regular equipment to be
procured directly from suppliers of known qualification; or
Shopping
may be resorted to under any of the following instances:
(a) When there is an unforeseen contingency
requiring immediate purchase: Provided, however, That the amount shall not
exceed Fifty Thousand Pesos (P50,000); or
(b) Procurement of ordinary or regular office
supplies and equipment not available in the Procurement Service involving an
amount not exceeding Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Pesos (P250,000): Provided,
however, That the Procurement does not result in Splitting of Contracts:
Provided, further, That at least three (3) price quotations from bona fide
suppliers shall be obtained. The above amounts shall be subject to a periodic
review by the GPPB. For this purpose, the GPPB shall be authorized to increase
or decrease the said amount in order to reflect changes in economic conditions
and for other justifiable reasons.
5. Negotiated Procurement – shall
only be allowed under the following cases:
a. In cases of two failed biddings;
b. In case
of imminent danger to life or property during a state of calamity, or when time
is of the essence arising from natural or man-made calamities or other causes
where immediate action is necessary to prevent damage to or loss of life or
property, or to restore vital public services, infrastructure facilities and
other public utilities;
c. Take-over of contracts, which have been
rescinded or terminated for causes provided for in the contract and existing
laws, where immediate action is necessary to prevent damage to or loss of life
or property, or to restore vital public services, infrastructure facilities and
other public utilities;
d. Where the subject contract is adjacent or
contiguous to an on-going infrastructure project, as defined in the Implementing Rules and Regulations;
Provided, however, That the original contract is the result of a Competitive
Bidding; the subject contract to be negotiated has similar or related scopes of
work; it is within the contracting capacity of the contractor; the contractor
uses the same prices or lower unit prices as in the original contract less
mobilization cost; the amount involved does not exceed the amount of the
ongoing project; and, the contractor has no negative slippage: Provided,
further, That negotiations for the procurement are commenced before the expiry
of the original contract. Whenever applicable, this principle shall also govern
consultancy contracts, where the consultants have unique experience and
expertise to deliver the required service; or
e. Subject to the guidelines specified in the Implementing
Rules and Regulations, purchases of Goods from another agency of the
Government, such as the Procurement Service of the DBM, which is tasked with a
centralized procurement of commonly used Goods for the government in accordance
with Letters of Instruction No. 755 and Executive Order No. 359, series of
1989.
The
Alternative Method of Procurement may be resorted only to highly exceptional cases, to promote economy and efficiency, and justified by conditions specified in the law and its Implementing Rules and Regulations.
In
all instances, the Procuring Entity shall ensure that the most advantageous
price for the Government is obtained.
For
further information on Government Procurement, please refer to Government
Procurement Policy Board at www. gppb.gov.ph.
References:
1.
Republic Act
9184;
2.
Implementing
Rules and Regulations of RA 9184
Last Updated:
30 June 2015
Wednesday, October 26, 2016
Affidavit of Guardianship
Note:
This is only a sample Affidavit of Guardianship. It could be subject to modifications to suit the purpose/s of its execution and requirements of the parties. It is advisable that before an execution of any legal document, one must seek legal advice or assistance from a Lawyer.
2. The above mentioned minors are under my care and custody since my daughter, MAPUTI B. AKOH passed away last October 19, 2015;
Republic of the Philippines )
City of Makati ) Sc.
AFFIDAVIT OF GUARDIANSHIP
I, MAGANDA
B. AKOH, of legal age, married, Filipino citizen, and presently
residing at 143 ILoveYou Village, Barangay May Forever, Makati City, after having
been duly sworn to in accordance with law, do hereby depose and say, that:
1.
I am the grandmother and guardian of the following minors who have an
interest in the monetary claims and benefits as well as in insurance policy and
separation pay (if and applicable) of the late MAPUTI B. AKOH (my daughter), payable by SSS, Pag-IBIG,AND
Alive Inc.;
Full Name of Minor/s
|
Date of Birth
|
Age
|
MABAIT
AKOH
|
January 18, 2005
|
11
|
MATAPANG
AKOH
|
July 31, 2009
|
7
|
2. The above mentioned minors are under my care and custody since my daughter, MAPUTI B. AKOH passed away last October 19, 2015;
3.
I am competent to receive in behalf of the said minors any amount/s due to
them;
4.
I am not an imbecile, insane, a vagrant or a vicious person or
a habitual drunkard or a habitual criminal, and have not
abandoned, neglected or refused to support said minor/s or
caused him/them to commit offenses against the law; and
5.
I am executing this affidavit to attest to the truth of all the foregoing
statements and for whatever legal purpose it may serve.
IN
WITNESS WHEREOF,
I have hereunto set my hand this ____ day of _______ 2016 at ______________,
Philippines.
MAGANDA
B. AKOH
Affiant
JURAT
SUBSCRIBED
AND SWORN to before me this ____ day of ______________ 2016 in
_________, Philippines, affiant personally exhibited to me her Senior
Citizen ID No. 2016-1234567890, issued
on June 18, 2016 at Makati City.
NOTARY
PUBLIC
Doc No. :
_____
Page No.:
______
Book No.:
______
Series of
2016.
Friday, October 14, 2016
VERIFICATION WITH CERTIFICATION OF NON-FORUM SHOPPING
VERIFICATION
WITH CERTIFICATION OF
NON-FORUM
SHOPPING
I, DIWATA
A. KOH, of legal age, single and with residence at No. 123 Forever Compound, IloveYou Village,
City of Manila, after having been duly sworn to in accordance with law
do hereby depose and state that:
1. I am
the Petitioner in the above-captioned case;
2. I have caused the preparation of the
foregoing Petition and that the allegations therein are true and correct of my
own personal knowledge based on authentic documents on record;
3. I have not heretofore commenced any other
action or proceeding involving the same issues in the Supreme Court, the Court
of Appeals, or any other tribunal or agency as are raised in this case;
4. To the best of my knowledge, no such action
or proceeding is pending in the Supreme Court, the Court of Appeals or any
tribunal or agency;
5. If I should thereafter be aware or learn
that a similar action or proceeding has been filed or is pending before the
Supreme Court, the Court of Appeals or any other tribunal or agency, I will
undertake to report this fact within five (5) days there from to this Court.
DIWATA A. KOH
Affiant
JURAT
SUBSCRIBED
AND SWORN
to before me this ____________________, affiant exhibited to me her Philippine Passport ID No. EB1234567 issued
on May 30, 2016 in Pasay City, Philippines.
NOTARY PUBLIC
Doc. No. _____;
Page No. _____;
Book No._____;
Series of 2016.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
Contractual/Job Orders and Casual employees are two distinct employment status of workers in the government based on Civil Service Commi...
-
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES REGIONAL TRIAL COURT _____________ JUDICIAL REGION _____________ IN RE: PETITION FOR COMMISSION ...
-
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES ____________ JUDICIAL REGION REGIONAL TRIAL COURT Branch ____ _________________ RE: I...