Thursday, October 13, 2016

Affidavit of Abandonment




This is only a sample of Affidavit of Abandonment.  It could be subject to modifications to suit the facts to be stated by the affiant. It is advisable that before an execution of any legal document, one must seek legal advice or assistance from a Lawyer.



Republic of the Philippines)
Quezon City                        )          Sc.


AFFIDAVIT OF ABANDONMENT


I, AAA A. AAA, Filipino, of legal age, single/married, and with permanent residence in 143 ILoveYou Village, Barangay May Forever, Quezon City, after having been duly sworn to in accordance with law hereby depose and state, that:

1.     I am married to BBB B.BBB  in City of Manila on February 14, 2005.  Copy of the marriage contract is hereto attached as Attachment 1 and made an integral part of this Affidavit;

2.    We cohabited as husband and wife from year February 2005 to  July 30, 2009;

3.    Out of that marriage, CCC A BBB was born on April 12, 2007.  Copy of the Birth Certificate is hereto attached as Attachment 2 and made an integral part of this Affidavit;

4.    My spouse BBB B. BBB, left the conjugal home in Manila on July 30, 2009 and from thereon, abandoned me and my child;

5.    Since  he left the conjugal dwelling in July 2009, he has not communicated with us nor extended any financial support whatsoever;

6.    My child and I had already loss communications from him and his relatives.  Diligent efforts were made to reach him but to no avail;

7.    Since his abandonment in 2009, I have been solely supporting our child;

8.    I am executing this affidavit to attest to the truth of the foregoing facts, particularly, the abandonment of my spouse; and for whatever legal purpose it may serve.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this December 28, 2014 in Quezon City, Philippines.


AAA A. AAA
Affiant

Signed in the presence of:

_______________________            ______________________


JURAT

         SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this ___________ day of _____________________at the City of ____________, affiant personally appeared and exhibited her Philippine Passport No. ________________________ , issued on _________________ in the City of ___________, Philippines.


NOTARY PUBLIC

Doc No. ________;
Page No. _______;
Book No. ________;
Series of 2014.


Thursday, October 6, 2016

Petition Calling for Stockholder’s Meeting



Note:
This is only a sample Petition Calling for Stockholder’s Meeting.  It could be subject to modifications depending to the circumstances/basis of the petition.


REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
Department of Finance
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (SEC)
SEC Building, EDSA Greenhills
Mandaluyong, Metro Manila
Philippines



IN THE MATTER OF

ABC, INC.
SEC Reg. No. PHL09-00143

                                                          SEC CASE NO._________   
                                                          For:   Calling a Special Meeting
and Election of Officers

XYZ, INC.
Petitioner .         

X- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X


PETITION
For Calling A Special Stockholder’s Meeting and Election of Officers


PETITIONER, YXZ INC., through counsel and unto this Honorable Commission, most respectfully states, that:

1.                Petitioner is a domestic corporation duly organized and existing under the Corporation Code and registered with Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), with office address at 1000 Tower, Unit 456, Garnet Road, Pasig City, where it maybe served with Commission’s notices and other processes;

2.                ABC, Inc. (“ABC” for brevity ) is a duly registered stock corporation, with SEC Registration No. PHL09-00143  and has its principal office  at Unit 143, 2000 Building, Garnet Road, Pasig City;

3.                Petitioner is the developer–owner of the ABC and owns 59% of the total shares of stock of ABC.  Copy of the list of Certificate of Stock is hereto attached as Annex “A” and made an integral part of this Petition;

4.                Under the new By-Laws of ABC, the annual stockholders meeting shall be held on the last working day of April of every year.  However, the last stockholder’s meeting was held on 29 April 2008 where five directors were elected, namely: Cinderella One, Snow White Two, Fiona Three, Barbie Four and Ken Fifth.  Copy of the new By-Laws is attached as Annex “B” hereof;

5.                In 2009, ABC failed to conduct its annual stockholder’s meeting in view of the Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) issued by Branch 20 of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Pasig, enjoining ABC from holding its Annual Stockholders Meeting scheduled on April 30, 2009;

6.                With said TRO issued in 2009 up to this date, no stockholder’s meeting was conducted.  Thus, all its current directors are in hold-over capacities;

7.                Since  the last election of the Board of Directors was in 2008, the number of directors  standing  in the Board as of date is reduced to three (3) and two of them are facing disqualification petition before the special commercial court of Regional Trial Court of Pasig;

8.                On 12 February 2011, XYZ filed a Petition calling for a Special Stockholder’s Meeting before this Honorable Commission and which thereafter issued an Order dated 29 March 2012 directing the Corporate Secretary to send notices of the Stockholders Meeting and election of directors to all stockholders of the corporation.  Copy of said Order is hereto attached as Annex “C”;

9.                Despite the said Order of the Honorable Commission,  ABC’s Board of Directors failed to convene after notices had been duly given to all members of the Board, insisting the TRO issued by the Regional Trial Court of Pasig City ;

10.            On 28 August 2014, the Regional Trial Court of Pasig City, Branch 20 rendered a Decision in SEC Case No. 018-28, entitled, “Prince Charming and Queen Amidala vs. ABC, Inc.; XYZ Inc. (Defendant-in-Intervention), denying and dismissing the Complaint for Annulment of certain provisions of Section 2, Article XVI of the new By-Laws of ABC.  Copy of said decision is hereto attached as Annex “D”;

11.           In view of the dismissal of the Complaint filed by shareholders of ABC, herein Petitioner requested ABC (for the nth time) to call for a special stockholders meeting for the purpose of electing new set of Directors.  On its letter dated 9 November 2014, Petitioner contends that with the dismissal of the Complaint filed by Prince Charming and Queen Amidala, there will be no more legal impediment for ABC to call the said meeting.   Copy of said letter is hereto attached as Annex “E”;

12.           In their reply dated 19 December  2014, ABC denied the request of the herein  Petitioner  to call for a special stockholder’s meeting in view of the  Petition for Review filed by Prince Charming.  Copy of said letter is hereto attached as Annex “F”;

13.           On 29 January 2015, XYZ, Inc.  sent another letter to ABC, reiterating its previous request to call for a special stockholder’s meeting for the purpose of electing new set of Directors.  Copy of said letter is hereto attached as Annex “G”;

14.           In view of the dismissal of the Complaint filed by Prince Charming and Queen Amidala, the calling of a Special Meeting for the purpose of electing new set of Directors notwithstanding of any appeal or petition filed Prince Charming, is proper unless restrained by the appellate court.  In the case of Spouses Daisy and Socrates Arevalo (18 April 2012) citing  Unionbank v. Court of Appeals (G.R. No. 177486, 21 December 2009), the court said:

“The present case having been heard and found dismissible as it was in fact dismissed, the writ of preliminary injunction is deemed lifted, its purpose as a provisional remedy having been served, the appeal therefrom notwithstanding.

Unionbank v. Court of Appeals enlightens:

xxx a dismissal, discontinuance or non-suit of an action in which a restraining order or temporary injunction has been granted operates as a dissolution of the restraining order or temporary injunction,” regardless of whether the period for filing a motion for reconsideration of the order dismissing the case or appeal therefrom has expired. The rationale therefor is that even in cases where an appeal is taken from a judgment dismissing an action on the merits, the appeal does not suspend the judgment, hence the general rule applies that a temporary injunction terminates automatically on the dismissal of the action. (Emphasis supplied.)


15.           Petitioner respectfully submits to the Honorable Commission that there is an urgent need for ABC to call for a special stockholder’s meeting in order to elect new set of Board of Directors considering that the present number of director is not legally sufficient to transact business requiring majority vote of the total membership of the board, not only for lack of quorum but also for want of unanimity in decision on important business matters, and thus, operations of ABC are severely hampered; and to comply with reportorial requirements of this Commission as the present officers failed to comply.


P R A Y E R         


WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully prays that it be authorize by this Honorable Commission, under its supervision, to immediately call a Special Stockholders Meeting of ABC for the purpose of electing its new set Board of Directors in accordance with the new By-Laws s. 2005 of ABC.

Other relief just and equitable are likewise prayed for.

Quezon City for Mandaluyong City, Philippines.

20 March 2015.

Respectfully Submitted.








ATTY. SUNSHINE BAHAGHARI
Unit 143 Love Well Building, Who Goat Road, Quezon City
Contact No. 0914-812-28-70
 IBP No. 123456/1-18-2015/Q.C.
PTR No. 2468000/1-18-2015
Roll No. 10000
MCLE  Certificate No. VII-00XXXX



VERIFICATION


I, BARBIE SHAW BLOULEVARD, under oath, do hereby state that:

1.     I am the President of XYZ INC., duly authorized to execute this Verification pursuant to my authority as evidenced by the attached Secretary’s Certificate dated __________;

2.     I have caused the preparation of the foregoing Petition and read all the allegations in the Petition.  I attest that the factual allegations therein are true and correct to the best of my own personal knowledge and based on authentic records.

3.     That I have not heretofore commenced any other action or proceeding involving the same issues in the Supreme Court, the Court of Appeals, or any other tribunal or agency as raised in this case;

4.     That to the best of my knowledge, no such action or proceeding is pending in the Supreme Court, the Court of Appeals or any tribunal or agency;

5.     That if I should thereafter be aware or learn that a similar action or proceeding has been filed or is pending before the Supreme Court, the Court of Appeals, or any other tribunal or agency, I will undertake to report this fact within five (5) days therefrom to this Commission.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed this instrument on ___________, Quezon City.



                                                          BARBIE SHAW BLOULEVARD
                                                                             Affiant


JURAT

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me in the City of ___________ on this day of _____________, affiant exhibiting before me her Driving License No. __________ with an expiry date of December 18, 2015, issued by the Land Transportation Office in Quezon City, Philippines.

                                                                                      NOTARY PUBLIC


Doc. No.   ______;
Page No.  ______;
Book No.   ______;
Series of 2015.






Wednesday, October 5, 2016

Contractual Employees/Job Order vs Casual Employees in Civil Service


Contractual/Job Orders and Casual employees are two distinct employment status of workers in the government based on Civil Service Commission Memorandum Circular No. 40 (s. 1998). 
Distinctions of the two terms based on CSC Memorandum Circular Nos. 40 (s. 1998) and 17-02 (s. 2002) are as follows:
Nature of Appointment
Contractual/Job Order Employees
Casual Employees
Definition
An appointment issued to a person who shall undertake a specific job for a limited period not to exceed six (6) months.  
An appointment issued to a person to undertake essential and necessary services where there are not enough regular staff to meet the demands of the service.
Applicable Laws
Not covered by Civil Service law, rules and regulations, but covered by Commission on Audit (COA) rules.
Governed by the Civil Service Rules and Regulations.
Nature of Functions/Works
The contract covers particular services such as janitorial, security, or consultancy .
Performed functions that are essential and necessary to the services of the government agency where there are not enough regular staff to meet the demands of the service.
Specific Limitations/Prohibitions
1. The Contract of Service/Job Order  covers piece of work or intermittent job for a period not exceeding six months;

2. Services rendered under this appointment are not considered government service;

3. No employer-employee relationship with the government;

4. Those who are being hired to perform functions pertaining to vacant regular plantilla positions are prohibited from being hired under a contract of services and job order;

1. Casual employees perform functions of the regular employees;



2. Services rendered under this employment are considered government service;

3. There is an employer-employee relationship;



Benefits

1.  Contractual employees are not entitled to benefits entitled by the government employees, such as PERA, ACA and RATA.



1.  Casual employees are entitled to receive benefits enjoyed by regular employees such as PERA, ACA, RATA, mid/year-end bonuses, cash gift, clothing allowance, productivity incentive bonus, loyalty, award/pay, performance-based bonus, etc, and subject to guidelines thereof.

Leave Privileges

1. Entitled to all kinds of leave per CSC rules and  Memorandum Circulars.