I
was looking for a relevant jurisprudence about TIME when I was lead to a
separate dissenting opinion, which reminds me that time gone will never come
back, just like love ones who left and will never be with us again because of
death or someone who left because of choice of different journey with us.
They may be gone but we are still having our time for our own journey to
continue and make the most out of it. An excerpt from said opinion:
“…
The world in which people live has two great dimensions: the dimension of space
and the dimension of time. Nobody can say that the difference in time
between two acts or events makes for a superficial difference. Such
difference is the substance of human existence. As the Bible says:
There is an appointed
time for everything and
A time for every
affair under the heavens.
A time to be born,
and a time to die;
A time to plant, and
a time to uproot the plant.
A time to kill, and a
time to heal;
A time to tear down, and
a time to build.
A time to weep, and a
time to laugh;
A time to mourn, and
a time to dance;
A time to scatter
stones, and
A time to gather
them;
A time to embrace,
and a time to be far from embraces.
A time to seek, and a
time to lose;
A time to keep, and a
time to cast away;
A time to rend, and a
time to sew;
A time to be silent
and a time to speak.
A time to love, and a
time to hate;
A time of war, and a
time of peace.
(Ecclesiastes 3:1-8,
New American Bible)
Recognizing
the irreversibility of time is indispensable to every sound decision that
people make in their lives everyday, like not combing the hair that is no
longer there. In time, parents let their married children leave to make
their own homes. Also, when a loved one
passes away, he who is left must know that he cannot bring back the time that
is gone. He is wise to move on with his life after some period of mourning. To deny
the truth that the difference in time makes for substantial difference in human
lives is to deny the idea of transition from growth to decay, from life to
death, and from relevant to irrelevant.
(Separate Dissenting
Opinion of J. Abad, G.R. No. 192935 and G.R. No. 193036, December 7,
2010)
*Underscoring is mine.
No comments:
Post a Comment